FOREIGN-STATE

FOR THE VACATION OF THE QUALIFICATION OF THE FOREIGN-STATE: TITLE-~28: U.S.C.S.~2072 WITH THE D.-C.-C.-~44.1.

~1 ATTENTION: FOR THE TRAP OF THE CITIZENS ARE WITH TH ECLAIM OF THE FICTIONAL-TITLE~28: U.S.C.S.~2071: FOR THE CIVIL-CLAIM OF THE UNIFORM-USE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS[SIC] IS WITH THE WORDS OF THE FUTURE-TENSE OF THE FICTION-COURT’S-ENGLISH-LANGUAGE. ~2 FOR THE STATEMENT: “RECOGNITION BY CONGRESS OF THE BROAD-RULE-MAKING-POWER OF THE COURT WILL MAKE [RULE-MAKING-POWERS] “IT” POSSIBLE FOR THE COURT AND UNIFORM-PROCEDURES” (“TO” = FOR THE FUTURE-TENSE) IS WITH AN ASSUMPTION-AUTHORITY IN THE FUTURE, AGAINST THE NOE-TIME-JURISDICTION OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-LAWS, RULES OR CLAIMS. ~3 [FOR THE TITLE~28: U.S.C.S.~2071: NOTES: FORMER-ATTORNEY-GENERAL: CUMMINGS SAID, “LEGISLATIVE-BODIES HAVE NEITHER THE TIME “TO” INQUIRE OBJECTIVE(NO-CONTRACT) FOR THE DETAILS OF THE JUDICIAL-PROCEDURES(NO-CAUSE) FOR THE OPPORTUNITY “TO” NO-AMENDMENT OR NO-CHANGE. ~4 FOR THE WORD “TO INQUIRE” IN THE FUTURE-TENSE AND “TO CLAIM”(VERB-FICTION) IN THE FUTURE-TENSE IS WITH THE VOID OF THE JURISDICTION BY THE JUDGEMENT OF A THING IN THE NOW-TENSE BY THE NEGLECT OF THE DUE-PROCESS OF THE LAW WITH THE FACTS.

~5 FOR THE TITLE~28: U.S.C.S.~2071: NOTES: “THE1 RULES2 OF1 EVIDENCE2 IN1 FICTION-COURT2″(ADVERB-VERB): FOR THE PROCEEDINGS(NO-CAUSE) ARE WITH THE CIVIL-PROCEDURES(NO-CONTRACT) IN THE OTHER-COURTS. ~6 FOR4 THE1 COURT-COLORING2 OF1 LAW2(FICTION-VERB) = LAW OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION-POSTAL-FRINGE-FLAG OR ADORNMENTS ON THE FLAG OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION-JURISDICTION.

~7 FOR THE FICTIONAL-TITLE~28: U.S.C.S.~2072(B): FOR THE RULES AGAINST THE ABRIDGE, ENLARGE OR MODIFICATION OF ANY CLAIM OF THE PERSON ARE WITH THE LAWS IN THE CONFLICT-RULES AGAINST THE FORCE OR: EFFECT WITH THE CLAIMS-EFFECT.

:COPYCLAIMS/COPYRIGHTS-~JANUARY-~1980-THROUGH-~NOW-TIME BY THE PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE, ~12-~AUGUST-~1999, &: POSTMASTER, &: FEDERAL-JUDGE, &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: 21-~DECEMBER-~2012, PHILIDELPHIA-PENNSILVYNIA, BENJARMAN: FRANKLIN-COUT-OPENING WITH THE NEW-POSTAL-CHARTER, OATH, CONSTITUTION, JUDGES-OATH BY THE David-Wynn: Miller AND: PIOSTMASTER-GENERAL, &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-JUDGE: Russell-Jay: Gould.

FOR THESE 80,000-HOURS OF THE PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR and: CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-STUDIES OF THE CORRECT-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-LAW-TRANSLATIONS WITHIN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE ARE WITH THE DOCUMENT-CLAIM BY THIS FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: David-Wynn: Miller &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: Russell-Jay: Gould.

FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR(C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.) OF THIS DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE IS WITH THESE CLAIMS OF THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-EQUITY-COURT OF THE TWO-OR-MORE-PERSONS WITH THE CONTRACT-VESSEL-CLOSED-DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-COURT-TERMS BY AN ORIGINAL-PAPER-REGISTERED-MAIL-DOCUMENT-VENUE.

FOR THE DOCUMENT-PAPER-VESSEL OF THE QUO-WARRANTO-COMPLAINT IS WITHIN THE CLAIM OF THE PAPER-VESSEL-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE AS THE CLOSED-AREA-VESSEL-COURT WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTION-CONTRACT BETWEEN THESE TWO-OR-MORE-PERSONS WITHIN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FREDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-COURT-VENUE BY THE WRITTEN-EVIDENCE-BONDED(GLUED, STICH, RIVET)-COURT-COMPLAINT-DOCUMENT.

FOR THE TERMS OF A C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-DOCUMENT-CONTRACT ARE WITH THE TERMS’-CLAIM IN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-EQUITY-COURT WITH THE VOID OF AN OUTSIDE-CLAIMS BY A FOREIGN-PAPER, FOREIGN-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-FICTION-LAWS, RULES, CODES, OR: REGULATIONS OF THE MODIFICATION-FICTION-PRONOUN-ADVERB-VERB-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, ADVERB-ADJECTIVE-PRONOUN-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, ADVERB-VERB-ADVERB-VERB-ADVERB-VERB-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, OR ADJECTIVE-PRONOUN-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR BY THE FRAUDULENT-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR.